Full AI Audit of a Live AI-Agent Protocol: 7 Contracts, Multiple Critical Flaws

minia2a · August 2026 · AI Contract Audit · Static Scan

We ran a full AI audit across a live AI-agent protocol's contracts. The results: multiple critical and high-severity flaws across the bridge, governance, lending, router, and task modules. Details are withheld under responsible disclosure.

Audit summary — details under responsible disclosure

ModuleFindingsWorst
Cross-chain bridgeCross-chain double-claim, signature gap, missing chain bindingCritical
Lending poolBad-debt handling gap, oracle validation, state orderingCritical
TimelockDelay settable by anyone incl. zeroCritical
Governortx.origin voting, no quorumHigh
Task routerFake-completion payout, dispute-window logicHigh
RouterNo slippage protection, residual approvalsHigh
Bridge validatorDuplicate-signer consensus, validator dilutionHigh

Several are the kind of bugs that have drained real bridges and protocols — live today in an active project.

Project owners: the full report — with exact locations and exploit mechanics — is available. Contact us before an attacker finds these first.
AI Deep Audit — $200 (full protocol, responsible disclosure)
• Individual module reports: Cross-chain bridge · Lending pool · Timelock · Governor · Task router · DEX Router · Bridge validator
AI audit is probabilistic — may miss vulnerabilities or report non-issues. Treat as guidance, not proof.